Astro admission news 2009
Astro admission news 2009
Please inform others about the admission/rejection news you will/have receive/d from different Astronomy graduate programs in 2009.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I (and some others in this forum) received an admission from UT Austin two days ago.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
How is this differrent from this thread?
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I guess its title is more precise and have the date on it; so probably easier to find for others.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
by the way, congrats! and please consider posting your profile in the profile thread.Alistar wrote:I (and some others in this forum) received an admission from UT Austin two days ago.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
congrats Ren... btw if you get into IMPRES Garching go there.... the research institute has so much more money then most US schools
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I dunno why universities announce the astronomy results earlier than physics. even in schools that programs are joint and with the same deadline.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
less applicants, therefore, less work, therefore, quicker answers, simple as thatemperial wrote:I dunno why universities announce the astronomy results earlier than physics. even in schools that programs are joint and with the same deadline.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I am sure Garching is a great place for research. But I am not sure about their PhD program(in comparison to top US schools). Their program is only for 3 years and if you look at former students, they remain there for their post doc in the best cases. In addition the salary is not that much(given the fact Munich is an expensive city)Helio wrote:congrats Ren... btw if you get into IMPRES Garching go there.... the research institute has so much more money then most US schools
Re: Astro admission news 2009
that depends where in Munich you live (I have worked at the MPI for Physics)... I know people who got housing with sub-300 euro rent. I dunno i find the environment a bit more relaxed and conducive to research because you might not have to teach.Alistar wrote:I am sure Garching is a great place for research. But I am not sure about their PhD program(in comparison to top US schools). Their program is only for 3 years and if you look at former students, they remain there for their post doc in the best cases. In addition the salary is not that much(given the fact Munich is an expensive city)Helio wrote:congrats Ren... btw if you get into IMPRES Garching go there.... the research institute has so much more money then most US schools
- Fritz.Zwicky
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:38 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Hey dude,
you are just confusing everybody by starting a new thread about astronomy admissions. Cease and desist, otherwise even Jan Oort will not help you.
Fritz "Now You Are Just Pissing Me Off" Zwicky
you are just confusing everybody by starting a new thread about astronomy admissions. Cease and desist, otherwise even Jan Oort will not help you.
Fritz "Now You Are Just Pissing Me Off" Zwicky
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Thankfully, Gerard Kuiper is much more forgiving.Fritz.Zwicky wrote:Hey dude,
you are just confusing everybody by starting a new thread about astronomy admissions. Cease and desist, otherwise even Jan Oort will not help you.
Fritz "Now You Are Just Pissing Me Off" Zwicky
Keep the thread, it has a better title.
Last edited by nathan12343 on Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I applied to IMPRS Heidelberg, but it's not very high on my list at this point (I would've applied to Garching too, but was thinking the deadline was Dec. 15th and not the 1st). Heidelberg is a very nice city, and the grad students seemed happy, but my thoughts on the IMPRS program after I visited there this summer were that 1. a degree in 3 years seems really short, 2. the stipend isn't much, 3. I wouldn't want to have my research advisor set in stone from the moment I started, and 4. I think it's harder to get a US postdoc after finishing (although I guess everything depends on who you work with). I've heard Garching is pretty boring from people who have been there though; not close enough to Munich to go there regularly.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I also applied for IMPRS but for the Garching one and I think they were accepting applications even by the end of last year!astrophysicist2b wrote:I applied to IMPRS Heidelberg, but it's not very high on my list at this point (I would've applied to Garching too, but was thinking the deadline was Dec. 15th and not the 1st). Heidelberg is a very nice city, and the grad students seemed happy, but my thoughts on the IMPRS program after I visited there this summer were that 1. a degree in 3 years seems really short, 2. the stipend isn't much, 3. I wouldn't want to have my research advisor set in stone from the moment I started, and 4. I think it's harder to get a US postdoc after finishing (although I guess everything depends on who you work with). I've heard Garching is pretty boring from people who have been there though; not close enough to Munich to go there regularly.
Anyway I have the same concerns that you mentioned about IMPRS except I dont have any problem to work with someone I like, form the first day.
As you said their program is only for 3 years and you can imagine how big is the difference between a 4 or 5 years program and this 3 years one; most of PhD students who finished their PhD work with 4-5 first author papers in normal 4-5 years programs, publish 3-4 of them in the last one or two years of their work which makes the 4th and 5th years very important, if you are going to get a good post doc.
I followed the passed IMPRS students and found out they usually were able to stay in Garching in the best cases(probably to finish their works!)
I have also a few friends there, whom are not satisfied with the payment!
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I worked that MPI in Munich itself and they never complained about the pay, where Munich is way more expensive than Heidelberg. People always seem to forget with these programs that people are supposed to have a Masters when they enter, not a Bachelor as in the US. This means the two years in the US you typically spend for taking classes and getting your masters have to be deducted from the time. It also says that if you enter with a Bachelor you will need to get a Masters first, so your funding might be a bit stretched.Alistar wrote:I also applied for IMPRS but for the Garching one and I think they were accepting applications even by the end of last year!astrophysicist2b wrote:I applied to IMPRS Heidelberg, but it's not very high on my list at this point (I would've applied to Garching too, but was thinking the deadline was Dec. 15th and not the 1st). Heidelberg is a very nice city, and the grad students seemed happy, but my thoughts on the IMPRS program after I visited there this summer were that 1. a degree in 3 years seems really short, 2. the stipend isn't much, 3. I wouldn't want to have my research advisor set in stone from the moment I started, and 4. I think it's harder to get a US postdoc after finishing (although I guess everything depends on who you work with). I've heard Garching is pretty boring from people who have been there though; not close enough to Munich to go there regularly.
Anyway I have the same concerns that you mentioned about IMPRS except I dont have any problem to work with someone I like, form the first day.
As you said their program is only for 3 years and you can imagine how big is the difference between a 4 or 5 years program and this 3 years one; most of PhD students who finished their PhD work with 4-5 first author papers in normal 4-5 years programs, publish 3-4 of them in the last one or two years of their work which makes the 4th and 5th years very important, if you are going to get a good post doc.
I followed the passed IMPRS students and found out they usually were able to stay in Garching in the best cases(probably to finish their works!)
I have also a few friends there, whom are not satisfied with the payment!
I am not sure why people say Garching is so far out. All natural sciences and engineer for the TUM, the IPP, MPI Astrophysics, and MPI Quantum Optics are in Garching and the U6 takes you straight into the city, like literally into the city center. I knew people that commuted from the other end of city every day to work. This is not the US. The train ride takes maybe 30 minutes tops (into the city) and maybe 20 to the part of town where the bars are. There is nothing really to complain about, when it comes to location.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Good point about the master degree.Helio wrote: I worked that MPI in Munich itself and they never complained about the pay, where Munich is way more expensive than Heidelberg. People always seem to forget with these programs that people are supposed to have a Masters when they enter, not a Bachelor as in the US. This means the two years in the US you typically spend for taking classes and getting your masters have to be deducted from the time. It also says that if you enter with a Bachelor you will need to get a Masters first, so your funding might be a bit stretched.
I am not sure why people say Garching is so far out. All natural sciences and engineer for the TUM, the IPP, MPI Astrophysics, and MPI Quantum Optics are in Garching and the U6 takes you straight into the city, like literally into the city center. I knew people that commuted from the other end of city every day to work. This is not the US. The train ride takes maybe 30 minutes tops (into the city) and maybe 20 to the part of town where the bars are. There is nothing really to complain about, when it comes to location.
But still I think there is a big difference between 3 years program and 4-5 years program. Assuming the years you are working on your thesis research is 3 years in both cases, and you begin a totally different thing from you master work with someone else, there is still a big difference between beginning your work in the same environment as you did your master or going to a place which is totally new!
But in reality, in US graduate programs, lots of people simply continue their master work with the same adviser which is even better!
I dont have anything to say about the living costs and other things related to Munich as a city because I have not lived there! I just talked to some of my friends in the program and they told me the usual salary is less than for example what is usual in the Netherlands(by around 30%) and the costs are almost the same.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I knew that I was just pointing out my experience that is all.Alistar wrote:Good point about the master degree.Helio wrote: I worked that MPI in Munich itself and they never complained about the pay, where Munich is way more expensive than Heidelberg. People always seem to forget with these programs that people are supposed to have a Masters when they enter, not a Bachelor as in the US. This means the two years in the US you typically spend for taking classes and getting your masters have to be deducted from the time. It also says that if you enter with a Bachelor you will need to get a Masters first, so your funding might be a bit stretched.
I am not sure why people say Garching is so far out. All natural sciences and engineer for the TUM, the IPP, MPI Astrophysics, and MPI Quantum Optics are in Garching and the U6 takes you straight into the city, like literally into the city center. I knew people that commuted from the other end of city every day to work. This is not the US. The train ride takes maybe 30 minutes tops (into the city) and maybe 20 to the part of town where the bars are. There is nothing really to complain about, when it comes to location.
But still I think there is a big difference between 3 years program and 4-5 years program. Assuming the years you are working on your thesis research is 3 years in both cases, and you begin a totally different thing from you master work with someone else, there is still a big difference between beginning your work in the same environment as you did your master or going to a place which is totally new!
But in reality, in US graduate programs, lots of people simply continue their master work with the same adviser which is even better!
I dont have anything to say about the living costs and other things related to Munich as a city because I have not lived there! I just talked to some of my friends in the program and they told me the usual salary is less than for example what is usual in the Netherlands(by around 30%) and the costs are almost the same.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Just heard from IMPRS Heidelberg; I have to visit in a few weeks for interviews. Even though I'm somewhat concerned about the length of program, post-doc prospects, and having an advisor going in, my present advisor pointed out that I may meet people who I can collaborate with later, even if I don't end up going there. I'd at least like to spend a year in Germany at some point...
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I just received an e-mail from UC Santa Cruz astronomy, I'm apparently on their 'short list' and they will be conducting an interview with me on skype sometime in the next week.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Congratz Nathan and best wishes for you in the interview. I received the same email 3 hours ago...nathan12343 wrote:I just received an e-mail from UC Santa Cruz astronomy, I'm apparently on their 'short list' and they will be conducting an interview with me on skype sometime in the next week.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Alistar wrote:Congratz Nathan and best wishes for you in the interview. I received the same email 3 hours ago...nathan12343 wrote:I just received an e-mail from UC Santa Cruz astronomy, I'm apparently on their 'short list' and they will be conducting an interview with me on skype sometime in the next week.
You too, kind of nervous about this, though it's certainly nice to hear back from at least one school.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
congrats guys!
what do you mean by short list? short list for admission?? It's not a wait list is it?
what do you mean by short list? short list for admission?? It's not a wait list is it?
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Hey nathan12343 and Alistar,nathan12343 wrote:Alistar wrote:Congratz Nathan and best wishes for you in the interview. I received the same email 3 hours ago...nathan12343 wrote:I just received an e-mail from UC Santa Cruz astronomy, I'm apparently on their 'short list' and they will be conducting an interview with me on skype sometime in the next week.
You too, kind of nervous about this, though it's certainly nice to hear back from at least one school.
Congrats! Did you guys apply for the TASC graduate student program? Did you apply to the astronomy or the physics department?
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
bosem wrote: Hey nathan12343 and Alistar,
Congrats! Did you guys apply for the TASC graduate student program? Did you apply to the astronomy or the physics department?
Did not apply to the TASC program, and this is the astronomy department.
This is a short list for admission, not a wait list.Ren wrote:congrats guys!
what do you mean by short list? short list for admission?? It's not a wait list is it?
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I just got the Santa Cruz email too... I think I'm more nervous about a Skype interview than I would be for one in person.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Congrats guys!
Last edited by dustdevil on Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
astrophysicist2b wrote:I just got the Santa Cruz email too... I think I'm more nervous about a Skype interview than I would be for one in person.
webcam anyone? I use skype every day it is good quality... just think of it as a phone interview
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Does anyone have any advice for these interviews? Is it more of a formality than anything?
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I dont think they are going to ask you the answer of some detailed scientific problems. I think the best thing to do is to be yourself and present your background and interests good enough to make your case bold.nathan12343 wrote:Does anyone have any advice for these interviews? Is it more of a formality than anything?
BTW, it seems IMPRS-Garching is organizing its workshop-interview on 2-4 March, this year
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Another Santa Cruz email, this morning!
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I've heard the Santa Cruz interview is to make sure you're competent before they make the final decisions (both scientifically and socially). They've apparently had people they've accepted and then really regretted the decision upon meeting them in person, so this is supposed to cut down on such situations.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:00 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Whatever do you mean socially? Do I detect a hint of snobbery or prejudice in the application process?astrophysicist2b wrote:I've heard the Santa Cruz interview is to make sure you're competent before they make the final decisions (both scientifically and socially).
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:00 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
No, they want to make sure you're affable and not withdrawn and/or a stereotypical socially inept physicist. They want to be sure they can work with you over the next several years.quantumstringfield wrote:Whatever do you mean socially? Do I detect a hint of snobbery or prejudice in the application process?astrophysicist2b wrote:I've heard the Santa Cruz interview is to make sure you're competent before they make the final decisions (both scientifically and socially).
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Congrats on the michigan one....
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Whats wrong with being withdrawn and/or a stereotypical socially inept physicist ? Dirac was one. So am I. Though I'm no Dirac. Far from it.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I have my interview with UCSC in about 10 minutes, I'll update this post when it's over. REALLY nervous....
No reason to be nervous, it went great, really like a conversation, not like a formal scary interview.
No reason to be nervous, it went great, really like a conversation, not like a formal scary interview.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
haha...bosem wrote:Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
- Fritz.Zwicky
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 10:38 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
You can't use the same lines, that would be plagiarism. Unless the Princeton dude allows you to do that, it is all a game after all, just make sure you don't get caught.bosem wrote:Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
Fritz "astronomy professor" Zwicky
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
No, even if I had a transcript I'd still say no.bosem wrote:Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
When I read that I thought he was joking.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I had the same experience as Nathan with Santa Cruz; had to talk about my research (and let them talk about it), ask a few questions about the program, and clarify a few details in my application. Not at all scary. I couldn't get the skype video to work so that I could see them, so it was a rather interesting conversation with my computer screen.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Oh you broke my heart!nathan12343 wrote:No, even if I had a transcript I'd still say no.bosem wrote:Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
bosem wrote:Oh you broke my heart!nathan12343 wrote:No, even if I had a transcript I'd still say no.bosem wrote:Fingers crossed. I am looking forward to the details. Post up a transcript of your interview, please.
Sorry?
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
Do most schools do interviews? I was under the impression that that didn't happen much anymore.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I don't think so, I was surprised when Santa Cruz e-mailed me about it.
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I am also done with UCSC interview. They told me the final results would be known by one week or so.
No matter what would be the result, I really enjoyed it. I think other schools should do the same.
No matter what would be the result, I really enjoyed it. I think other schools should do the same.
In Europe its a part of usual procedure to accept PhD students. They also ask for a short presentation in addition to a general interview. But as far as I know it is not common in US, though some schools are doing that. Especially for international students to make sure they have the minimum of communication abilities.evilclaw2321 wrote:Do most schools do interviews? I was under the impression that that didn't happen much anymore.
- Synthesize
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:35 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
The University of Washington called this morning. I'm in!
- Unnatural Log
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 4:07 pm
Re: Astro admission news 2009
I got an acceptance from Arizona planetary sciences today! Not quite astro, but close enough.