Question about GPA conversion

  • This has become our largest and most active forum because the physics GRE is just one aspect of getting accepted into a graduate physics program.
  • There are applications, personal statements, letters of recommendation, visiting schools, anxiety of waiting for acceptances, deciding between schools, finding out where others are going, etc.

Post Reply
trupti
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:40 pm

Question about GPA conversion

Post by trupti » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:37 am

At present I am trying to convert my college grades in US GPA system out of 4. Our grading system is neither the relative grading out of 10 as in some of the colleges in India nor is it the usual percentage type of grading system. So the whole conversion process is getting a bit complicated. I would like to know what is the GPA of an average student in US. Or in a class of 40 what what will be the approximate rank of a student with GPA of 3.5 or a GPA of 3.
Thanks

User avatar
quizivex
Posts: 1031
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:13 am

Re: Question about GPA conversion

Post by quizivex » Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:09 am

Well, it looks like the forum is in a slump, so I suggest you bring this question up again when it becomes more active after the GREs when students start their apps. Those of us still lingering from last year are domestic so we haven't encountered this issue, but my advice would be one thing to international students:

If there's an "offical" formula for converting your school's GPA to the American scale, then use it... But otherwise, do not convert your GPA by any method that does not fairly represent your ability, or your relative position in your class... For instance, strong students in the US usually have GPAs over 3.7ish and top students may have near perfect GPAs (unless they come from a very challenging program or one that's unfriendly with grades)... Many foreign schools make the mean sit at a much lower "percent out of the maximum"... I recall a student from France saying his scale is out of 20 and anything 15 or higher is considered phenomenal... but if you converted 15/20 linearly with the US 4.0 scale, you'd have a 3.0 which wouldn't get you accepted anywhere... even St. Lucifer Institute of Technology.

So in a case like that, I think it's best to leave that part of the application blank. Hopefully the committees have heard of your school. Give your rank in your class (or have one of your recommenders do it). If you're one of the top students in your department, have your recommender reveal the average GPA of the students in your program in their own system and that will clarify your potential way better than some unreliable conversion to the 4.0 scale.

PS- Also, if you convert your GPA in an unofficial way, the school could get suspicious that you're making it up if it looks good.

Edit: Not long after I wrote this post, a token example appeared...
octavian wrote:Hi,
I studied in France for 5 years at INSA Lyon, INSA Toulouse, the University of Toulouse and the Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, I was in the top 10% like you with 15/20 averages and I applied to 9 Universities last year for the PhD : Harvard, Santa Barbara, Boston U, Washington, Miami, Northeastern, Oregon, UPenn, and another one I don't remember I had 109/120 at the Toefl, 900 at the Physics GRE and 800 in Math and 550 in Verbal. I had 2 recommendations letters from Toulouse, where I was in the top 5% and one from Italy, where I did an internship. I got accepted at Miami, Northeastern and Boston U and I chose Northeastern because they are one of the best in biophysics (they even made the cover of Nature in June)...so, from my experience, I would say that it is not so easy to get in the States. Perhaps they are put off by the grades we get in France, 15/20 is converted to 3.0/4 and that is not good for the top Universities... I remember that once I got a 20 at an exam and the guy who was in charge of the Master's lowered it to 16.5 because "20/20 is way too much" while in the US it is not uncommon to get a 4.0 ... good luck, apply to all the schools you want to get into, but be warned not to get your hopes too high ...
Last edited by quizivex on Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.

trupti
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:40 pm

Re: Question about GPA conversion

Post by trupti » Sun Aug 17, 2008 1:47 pm

Hey quiz..thanks
I am in middle of my class. I am worried whether I will be eligible for applying to most of the places. For PhD many places do require a minimum 3.5 and a 3 for MS

User avatar
quizivex
Posts: 1031
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:13 am

Re: Question about GPA conversion

Post by quizivex » Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:14 pm

Ah the one thing I forgot to say was try contacting each program directly (after checking the information on their websites, just in case they have the conversion information there). I'd say try the department secretary first, and if she can't answer she'll probably direct you to the committee chair.

Most responsible programs would be eager to help their future applicants.

Edit: By the way, don't be worried that you may not be eligible if you're in the middle of the class. In my graduating class, the ones that actually finished the physics degree all had GPAs over 3.5. Plenty of others in the program had low GPAs but changed majors and graduated with sometihng else. While my program was small, it's probably common in the US for the average GPA of a class of graduating physics majors to be over 3.5, so whatever conversion you use, you're probably entitled to a nice GPA 8)

trupti
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:40 pm

Re: Question about GPA conversion

Post by trupti » Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:14 am

Thanks quiz...
My worry is that my acedamic record seems very erratic. I have 6.7/10 in one semester and 9/10 in other. This is because my college changed its grading system for the last year of my degree. Also I will hate to explain this 'change in grading' stuff in my SOP as it will project my college in poor light. This will agian affect my admission chances negetively. How does admission committe look at an erratic acedemic record?



Post Reply