Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Since only profiles are allowed in the profiles thread, this is for discussing people's posts in the 2010 Profiles thread or commenting.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Geshi, you should post all of the schools you are applying to and update your post with the responses from all 15 schools. This is meant as a resource to future applicants, so they can gauge where they stand. Someday someone may be in a similar situation as yourself and will find your results useful.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
good luck to everyone! the next couple months of waiting are going to be brutal
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
hey, just curious what people think of these scores for getting into physics grad school
General GRE (took twice):
Q: 650 760
V: 520 540
W:4.0 4.5
Physics GRE (took twice):
470 (1st time)
500 (2nd time)
im just average american male applying to schools like NC state or UNC. what do you think my chances are with 1 year of research upon graduation.
General GRE (took twice):
Q: 650 760
V: 520 540
W:4.0 4.5
Physics GRE (took twice):
470 (1st time)
500 (2nd time)
im just average american male applying to schools like NC state or UNC. what do you think my chances are with 1 year of research upon graduation.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
GPA is 3.4ish for major and overall. major GPA is higher.chewy wrote:hey, just curious what people think of these scores for getting into physics grad school
General GRE (took twice):
Q: 650 760
V: 520 540
W:4.0 4.5
Physics GRE (took twice):
470 (1st time)
500 (2nd time)
im just average american male applying to schools like NC state or UNC. what do you think my chances are with 1 year of research upon graduation.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I had thought about that. For some of the schools I'm applying to, I was thinking people probably would not be looking into applying to as well. However, you are probably right. I'll update it later tonight.grae313 wrote:Geshi, you should post all of the schools you are applying to and update your post with the responses from all 15 schools. This is meant as a resource to future applicants, so they can gauge where they stand. Someday someone may be in a similar situation as yourself and will find your results useful.
Edit: terrible grammar.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Can anyone comment on my profile... I would be very glad..
Thanks
Thanks
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I think you have a very nice selection of schools considering your profile, I don't know how your engineering background will be seen but I would be very surprised if you got rejected from all the schools you applied to.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Kroner - you should apply to the applied math program at CU boulder, not the math program if that's what you're doing.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I hope I get into atleast one of them but this profile of unstuddmaddu http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1847 is really giving me a fear..Mataka wrote:I think you have a very nice selection of schools considering your profile, I don't know how your engineering background will be seen but I would be very surprised if you got rejected from all the schools you applied to.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:19 pm
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
fc_pga: pretty anxious to see your PGRE score
@blackcat:
ha ha.
..thats a scaaary profile.

@blackcat:
ha ha.


Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
It looks like the applied math department is mostly focused on numerical analysis and differential equations. I want to be doing topology and geometry, which is in the regular math department even when it has a physics context, so that's the one I ended up deciding on.nathan12343 wrote:Kroner - you should apply to the applied math program at CU boulder, not the math program if that's what you're doing.
I think the "applied"/"pure" split is mostly a historical distinction. For example things like graph theory go in "applied" even when they're not immediately applicable, and things like number theory and topology are "pure" even when the results are used in cryptography and physics respectively.
Last edited by kroner on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Kroner: that makes sense. When you said mathematical physics, I figured that was what you were interested in. Sorry for underestimating your grad school research.
And the applied/pure distinction is purely historical, at least at CU boulder. It's based on some old fight from 20 years ago plus the fact that professors in the engineering school get paid more.
And the applied/pure distinction is purely historical, at least at CU boulder. It's based on some old fight from 20 years ago plus the fact that professors in the engineering school get paid more.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
no problem. It's sort of an idiosyncratic division anyway.
Also, sorry I didn't mean to be editing my post out from under you.
Also, sorry I didn't mean to be editing my post out from under you.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I don't see why this profile is so scary, the guy got in Cornell and Maryland, both very good schools. He has an excellent profile of course, and it's pretty obvious that if he were american he would have got in many more places, but I think your selection of schools is more realistic than his, so you may not get as many rejections as him.blackcat007 wrote:I hope I get into atleast one of them but this profile of unstuddmaddu http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1847 is really giving me a fear..Mataka wrote:I think you have a very nice selection of schools considering your profile, I don't know how your engineering background will be seen but I would be very surprised if you got rejected from all the schools you applied to.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
yeah thats right.. i think i am getting paranoid these daysMataka wrote:I don't see why this profile is so scary, the guy got in Cornell and Maryland, both very good schools. He has an excellent profile of course, and it's pretty obvious that if he were american he would have got in many more places, but I think your selection of schools is more realistic than his, so you may not get as many rejections as him.blackcat007 wrote:I hope I get into atleast one of them but this profile of unstuddmaddu http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1847 is really giving me a fear..Mataka wrote:I think you have a very nice selection of schools considering your profile, I don't know how your engineering background will be seen but I would be very surprised if you got rejected from all the schools you applied to.

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Hi. Can anyone comment on my profile? Should I have more universities that would be safe?
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Well, after over a year of lurking on this board, I finally registered! Having finished all my applications, I figured it was about time.
I just posted my profile, if anyone wants to take a look. I basically applied to most of the big-name schools (a strategy I know some on this board disapprove of). The way I see it is, I'm not really sure what area of physics I want to go into yet, and the biggest schools are the ones where I'd be most likely to find a project that interests me. I think I have a decent shot of at least getting into some of them. If not, well, I'll probably apply to a few Canadian schools as backup.
I just posted my profile, if anyone wants to take a look. I basically applied to most of the big-name schools (a strategy I know some on this board disapprove of). The way I see it is, I'm not really sure what area of physics I want to go into yet, and the biggest schools are the ones where I'd be most likely to find a project that interests me. I think I have a decent shot of at least getting into some of them. If not, well, I'll probably apply to a few Canadian schools as backup.
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:34 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
With your grades, GRE scores, and research experience, I don't think you have anything to worry about.dct64xx wrote:Well, after over a year of lurking on this board, I finally registered! Having finished all my applications, I figured it was about time.
I just posted my profile, if anyone wants to take a look. I basically applied to most of the big-name schools (a strategy I know some on this board disapprove of). The way I see it is, I'm not really sure what area of physics I want to go into yet, and the biggest schools are the ones where I'd be most likely to find a project that interests me. I think I have a decent shot of at least getting into some of them. If not, well, I'll probably apply to a few Canadian schools as backup.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Well, that's reassuring. I'm paranoid cause last year I was rejected from several of the big name schools. Of course, I didn't have a 980 then.nathan12343 wrote:With your grades, GRE scores, and research experience, I don't think you have anything to worry about.dct64xx wrote:Well, after over a year of lurking on this board, I finally registered! Having finished all my applications, I figured it was about time.
I just posted my profile, if anyone wants to take a look. I basically applied to most of the big-name schools (a strategy I know some on this board disapprove of). The way I see it is, I'm not really sure what area of physics I want to go into yet, and the biggest schools are the ones where I'd be most likely to find a project that interests me. I think I have a decent shot of at least getting into some of them. If not, well, I'll probably apply to a few Canadian schools as backup.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I think it's safe to say that you will get a few rejections (like you're supposed to, especially with your choice of schools), but I would be very surprised if you didn't get accepted anywhere...
You said in your profile that you are currently taking a year off ? Are you doing research ? And if not, do you mention/explain it in your SOP ?
You said in your profile that you are currently taking a year off ? Are you doing research ? And if not, do you mention/explain it in your SOP ?
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Yeah, I touched on it. Basically, I want to use this year to travel (not that I've had a chance to do that yet). So I'm not doing any research currently, but it's fairly likely that I'll end up doing at least part-time research at some point during the year.Mataka wrote:You said in your profile that you are currently taking a year off ? Are you doing research ? And if not, do you mention/explain it in your SOP ?
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I'm applying to a crapload of schools.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:19 pm
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Hi Woolf:
Can you please let me know how good is research in Quantum electro dynamics /communications at Harvard.I tried researching myself, but could not get much info except for few pages from Prof. Capasso. Thanks in advance
Can you please let me know how good is research in Quantum electro dynamics /communications at Harvard.I tried researching myself, but could not get much info except for few pages from Prof. Capasso. Thanks in advance
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I just updated it.sravanskarri wrote:fc_pga: pretty anxious to see your PGRE score![]()
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:39 pm
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
hii friends,
kindly comment on my profile and chances...profile uploaded in the profile thread
thanx in advance
kindly comment on my profile and chances...profile uploaded in the profile thread
thanx in advance
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I was wondering if anyone could comment on my profile. I've been beating myself up pretty badly about my test scores
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I would personally recommend throwing some master's programs or some really low safety schools on your list. With that PGRE, you'll probably be viewed as a "risky" (even if you aren't really a risk ... unfortunately they do put stock in a bad PGRE) candidate. You are applying for astrophysics, and I've heard that astrophysics departments don't care about the PGRE as much as physics departments. I've mentioned this on these boards several times, but I'll mention it again. I'm a second time applicant because I applied last year to 7 programs and got 7 rejections. The most likely reason is that I had a 550 (20%) on the PGRE. I didn't apply to any *real* safety schools (everything on my list was top 50) and no master's programs.vttd wrote:I was wondering if anyone could comment on my profile. I've been beating myself up pretty badly about my test scores
Don't beat yourself up about your PGRE score. It happens to a lot of us. I've retaken the PGRE and gotten a 710. While not amazing, it's certainly a MUCH better score than a 550. The PGRE is obviously not a valid representation of your ability as a physicist. You can still get into grad school. Also you're applying to Berkley, and you go to undergrad there. Sounds like you also did a bunch of research there. You probably have a decent shot at getting in to Berkley. I don't know if talking to your current/past research advisers would help, but you might want to consider that option. I noticed you *might* get a 4th letter from a nobel laureatte. That uh ... *might* give you an edge

Another advantage you have is being a female. Why? You are probably well aware of this, but the ratio of males to females in physics is something ridiculous like 4:1.
You shouldn't sweat this process too much. Whatever you do, do not place your entire self worth on where you get in. That sounds ridiculous, but when I got those 7 rejections I was horribly depressed for a good 2 months. I kept telling myself I was stupid and yadda yadda yadda.
Best of luck to you! (Especially since you aren't applying to the same programs I am

Application is a mixed bag
Hey,
I've been trying to figure out where to apply.
Here's my quick stats :
Research : 1 REU, 2 different experimental/optics research experiences at home institution. 2 publications (neither 1st author)
GRE: 780M, 640V, 4.0
PGRE: 720 (59%)
GPA: 3.87
And, I graduated in 3 years and am currently a grad student at my undergrad institution. I am hoping to transfer. Will this help me much?? I will have taken 5 grad courses by the end of next semester.
So far I've applied to:
NYU,
Cornell
Princeton
MIT
UPenn
Boston University
Rutgers
and I will be applying to
Stony Brook
Columbia
University of Maryland
Brown
Finally, my interests are more on the theoretical side. I'm in interested in quantum computing and nonlinear dynamics. I'm also interested in mathematical physics, but so far don't have a very good background in it.
Right now I'm debating whether I should apply to UChicago? Their average pgre is 875, but I've also heard places accept a wide range of scores. Also, should I apply to more safeties, or would that be paranoid?
Thanks in advance for your input!
I've been trying to figure out where to apply.
Here's my quick stats :
Research : 1 REU, 2 different experimental/optics research experiences at home institution. 2 publications (neither 1st author)
GRE: 780M, 640V, 4.0
PGRE: 720 (59%)
GPA: 3.87
And, I graduated in 3 years and am currently a grad student at my undergrad institution. I am hoping to transfer. Will this help me much?? I will have taken 5 grad courses by the end of next semester.
So far I've applied to:
NYU,
Cornell
Princeton
MIT
UPenn
Boston University
Rutgers
and I will be applying to
Stony Brook
Columbia
University of Maryland
Brown
Finally, my interests are more on the theoretical side. I'm in interested in quantum computing and nonlinear dynamics. I'm also interested in mathematical physics, but so far don't have a very good background in it.
Right now I'm debating whether I should apply to UChicago? Their average pgre is 875, but I've also heard places accept a wide range of scores. Also, should I apply to more safeties, or would that be paranoid?
Thanks in advance for your input!
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Good day everybody.
I just posted my profile not to long ago.
I would really appreciate feedback: I have been losing sleep over this subject for a while.
I just posted my profile not to long ago.
I would really appreciate feedback: I have been losing sleep over this subject for a while.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
It's very early to say anything but I just received an email from UWM. It says that they'll probably make me an offer.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:52 pm
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Congrats! Wisconsin-Madison? What field did you apply to?serali wrote:It's very early to say anything but I just received an email from UWM. It says that they'll probably make me an offer.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
wow congrats!! was it some prof or the admission committee who sent you this mail?serali wrote:It's very early to say anything but I just received an email from UWM. It says that they'll probably make me an offer.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Milwaukee. I applied for gravity.
Blackcat: A professor, and yes I'm international.
Edit: I'll add my profile asap
Blackcat: A professor, and yes I'm international.
Edit: I'll add my profile asap
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Let's get some more profiles on the profile thread 

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I went ahead and threw profile in there. I know I have skimmed through them for the last year or so for fun... Now we all gotta play the waiting game... :-/
I would appreciate any comments.. It will be nice to actually get feedback rather than thinking/worrying about it all on my own, haha
I would appreciate any comments.. It will be nice to actually get feedback rather than thinking/worrying about it all on my own, haha
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Congrats! I just heard from UW-Milwaukee too on Friday! I got an email from a prof that said an offer was on the way, and they invited me to come for a visit!serali wrote:It's very early to say anything but I just received an email from UWM. It says that they'll probably make me an offer.
I was shocked that I got an acceptance this early! I'm pretty excited

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Congratulations! I'm in the same boat. I already got an e-mail saying I was accepted to a summer program for Kent that requires me to be an incoming student, which essentially says I'm getting accepted. We'll see how long it takes them to make it official... their application deadline isn't even here yet (Jan 31)
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Grats on UWM guys
It's a great little department with some awesome people.

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Is it just me, or is the waiting game killing everybody?
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
No it's not just you ...
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:14 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I am half dead waiting for the month of march. and in the meantime, the last semester of engineering is killing me.jones wrote:Is it just me, or is the waiting game killing everybody?

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Mildly reassuring! I can't seem to work on my thesis. It's good to know that the acceptance threads are empty for now.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
I was definitely in that boat last year when I applied to grad school. For me the waiting lasted until May when I realized those wait list schools were never going to take me off. Just hope you get at least 1 acceptance early! It really takes a lot of stress out. Good luck to everyone! 

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
definitely killing me too. I feel like I rolled the dice, applying to the schools that I did, with my verbal score. hopefully some of those cali schools pull through with the econ the way it is, but who knows.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Could someone please comment on my profile and what my chances would be of getting admitted. Thank you.
- YellowXDart
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:30 am
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Umm... Seeing that some people are already receiving responses from schools has suddenly made me VERY anxious. I know we aren't supposed to hear anything until February at the earliest, but you always hope that you'll be the lucky one with an early acceptance.
Sorry, just needed to have a public emo moment.
Sorry, just needed to have a public emo moment.

Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Hey, just hope you aren't one of the really unlucky ones that doesn't get accepted at all.YellowXDart wrote:Umm... Seeing that some people are already receiving responses from schools has suddenly made me VERY anxious. I know we aren't supposed to hear anything until February at the earliest, but you always hope that you'll be the lucky one with an early acceptance.
Sorry, just needed to have a public emo moment.
http://www.thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=physics
Only a couple schools seem to have sent out acceptances this early (UW-Milwaukee, UW-Madison, UPenn). I wouldn't get too anxious yet.
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
Yeah. If you look at previous years, very few grad schools start accepting applicants before February.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:52 pm
Re: Discussion: 2010 Applicant Profiles and Admission Results
It does however seem like that UW-Madison sends all of its acceptances in January. I was looking at last year's results. Everyone one who got accepted received the email on Jan 30. Since some people already got their acceptance emails on Jan 19 this year, could this mean that all the acceptances are already sent out and the rest are rejected?geshi wrote:Hey, just hope you aren't one of the really unlucky ones that doesn't get accepted at all.YellowXDart wrote:Umm... Seeing that some people are already receiving responses from schools has suddenly made me VERY anxious. I know we aren't supposed to hear anything until February at the earliest, but you always hope that you'll be the lucky one with an early acceptance.
Sorry, just needed to have a public emo moment.
http://www.thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=physics
Only a couple schools seem to have sent out acceptances this early (UW-Milwaukee, UW-Madison, UPenn). I wouldn't get too anxious yet.