Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:24 pm
Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Hi all
I am an international undergrad,
applying to Physics PhD programs of some US universities, including some top- and some mid-ranked ones.
When I chose the option whether to waive right to access the LoRs, I was unaware of the impact it may pose. So I chose no.
Two of my referees have already submitted their LoRs. So it is unlikely it can be changed.
Now I know this option can affect the confidentiality of the letters and give adcom bad impression.
I fear that it ruins my LoRs, especially one of my referees is well-known in the field I am applying to.
I understand that there is not much I can do now,
But how bad can it do if one considers applications to top-tiers, given that my other aspects such as GPA, PGRE and research experience are good?
Should I mention this in my SoP and explain that I was unaware of this issue?
I am an international undergrad,
applying to Physics PhD programs of some US universities, including some top- and some mid-ranked ones.
When I chose the option whether to waive right to access the LoRs, I was unaware of the impact it may pose. So I chose no.
Two of my referees have already submitted their LoRs. So it is unlikely it can be changed.
Now I know this option can affect the confidentiality of the letters and give adcom bad impression.
I fear that it ruins my LoRs, especially one of my referees is well-known in the field I am applying to.
I understand that there is not much I can do now,
But how bad can it do if one considers applications to top-tiers, given that my other aspects such as GPA, PGRE and research experience are good?
Should I mention this in my SoP and explain that I was unaware of this issue?
- WhoaNonstop
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:31 am
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Generally, I don't think it's a good idea to spend any time writing about anything unless you can put a good spin on it. I wouldn't waste space explaining this "mishap" when you can use all that space to show how awesome you are.cedricyu803 wrote:But how bad can it do if one considers applications to top-tiers, given that my other aspects such as GPA, PGRE and research experience are good?
Should I mention this in my SoP and explain that I was unaware of this issue?
-Riley
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:50 pm
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Yes, it can definitely hurt - your letters won't be taken very seriously. Simple solution. Send a letter (snail mail) to each place saying that you mistakenly checked the no box. Then add a statement waiving your right to see your letters. Make sure it is dated (so the date will be after the original non-waiver). That should alleviate any concerns.cedricyu803 wrote:Hi all
I am an international undergrad,
applying to Physics PhD programs of some US universities, including some top- and some mid-ranked ones.
When I chose the option whether to waive right to access the LoRs, I was unaware of the impact it may pose. So I chose no.
Two of my referees have already submitted their LoRs. So it is unlikely it can be changed.
Now I know this option can affect the confidentiality of the letters and give adcom bad impression.
I fear that it ruins my LoRs, especially one of my referees is well-known in the field I am applying to.
I understand that there is not much I can do now,
But how bad can it do if one considers applications to top-tiers, given that my other aspects such as GPA, PGRE and research experience are good?
Should I mention this in my SoP and explain that I was unaware of this issue?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:24 pm
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Thanks for the replies of WhoaNonstop and admissionprof.Yes, it can definitely hurt - your letters won't be taken very seriously. Simple solution. Send a letter (snail mail) to each place saying that you mistakenly checked the no box. Then add a statement waiving your right to see your letters. Make sure it is dated (so the date will be after the original non-waiver). That should alleviate any concerns.

I have sent emails to the admissions to see whether it can be changed.
You suggestion of adding a statement waiving your right to see your letters may be good. (Maybe I'll put it together with my SOP when submitting) But I wonder if the adcomm will think that my original option (not waiving) may have already caused my referees to write the LoRs "more carefully", hence making them less trustworthy.
Nonetheless I will state in the statement that my referees do not mind that and this option does not affect how they write their letters.
Hope it solve the problem

Thanks again
- WhoaNonstop
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:31 am
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Yep, agreed, but I wouldn't actually put it in your SOP!admissionprof wrote:Simple solution. Send a letter (snail mail) to each place saying that you mistakenly checked the no box.
-Riley
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:24 pm
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
now UCB ad office changed the waiver of the unsubmitted lor only, keeping the other two submitted unchanged.
seems that i need a line in sop to explain this odd thing...
what do you think?
Thz
seems that i need a line in sop to explain this odd thing...
what do you think?
Thz
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
I think you should do what admissionprof suggested -- write a letter directly to the department to put in your file. If the application allows you to attach extra PDFs, perhaps you should also attach it here (in addition to mailing them the letter snail mail).
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:24 pm
Re: Did not waive right to access the LoRs. How bad can it do?
Now I have changed waiver of letter from the referee not having started.
And I think I will include a declaration to waive the right of the remaining two, with my signature
and the referees co-signing on it (I don't think only my words will convince the adcomm),
and also state that "My referees did not require the waiver and they clearly asserted that this option would not affect how they wrote the letters. I also maintain that I have not seen the letters."
then upload it to the supplementary document page/ put it in the first page of my CV/ email to the office directly.
(I guess a scanned signed declaration should be enough coz many universities don't accept paper documents.
+I guess my referees will feel annoyed having to sign many same statements)
Hope it solves the problem (though I am sure my applications have gotten noticed in the bad way...)
Thanks for your suggestions
And I think I will include a declaration to waive the right of the remaining two, with my signature
and the referees co-signing on it (I don't think only my words will convince the adcomm),
and also state that "My referees did not require the waiver and they clearly asserted that this option would not affect how they wrote the letters. I also maintain that I have not seen the letters."
then upload it to the supplementary document page/ put it in the first page of my CV/ email to the office directly.
(I guess a scanned signed declaration should be enough coz many universities don't accept paper documents.
+I guess my referees will feel annoyed having to sign many same statements)
Hope it solves the problem (though I am sure my applications have gotten noticed in the bad way...)
Thanks for your suggestions
