



yay gradschool
The name Jackson is infamous amongst physics graduate students who are, at many institutions, required to take an advanced course in theoretical electrodynamics taught out of J. D. Jackson's text Classical Electrodynamics. The course is well-known for its difficult homework problems and is referred to simply as “Jackson” in the field of physics. Many physicists who do not directly pursue research in the field of theoretical electrodynamics regard the Jackson course as a rite of passage in obtaining a Ph.D.
That was awesome!dlenmn wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T1aNg6v-L4
If you ever see Charles Kittel wandering around Berkeley, please flip him the finger. He deserves to be banished from the physics community after writing that atrocious solid state book, regardless of anything good he may have accomplished.zxcv wrote:from Jackson's own institution, we aren't actually doing any problems out of the text.
That's one of the reasons I'm glad we're not given course grades, especially since we're responsible for the prelim and general exams, which will test the same material and be plenty difficult themselves.twistor wrote:The proliferation of solutions manuals on the internet has doubtless made problem sets from the book obsolete.
Can't I get one from Griffiths instead. He's so much more of a badass.zxcv wrote:Indeed: the reason why I still care about grades in grad school is that if I get one of the top 2 grades in E&M, I get a T-shirt signed by J. D. Jackson himself.
Actually most of Jackson isn't that bad, I would just recommend Mathematica to save you hours of really gross algebra and ugly integrals. The part that gave me trouble was at the beginning of our course--we started from Landau and Lifshitz Classical Theory of Fields and CHs 11 and 12 in Jackson, which you probably won't do. If you anticipate covering this in your class, review (or teach yourself) tensor math/notation and relativity.cato88 wrote:Do you guys have any advice for preparing for using Jackson. What math techniques were common?
Any concepts that took a while? Any advice on picking up those concepts.
Thats the basic physics evolution.WhatCanYouDoFermi? wrote:If grad EM isn't a requirement of your program, is it really necessary to take it or to read Jackson for your own benefit and personal enlightenment? I feel that having gone through all of Griffiths in gory detail I thoroughly understand the subject and I wonder what the next level up of classical EM contains that I haven't already seen. Maybe I am just ignorant, but is it necessary for most research areas?
i can just say from sitting in grad EM... it is basically finding the green function for the weirdest geometries possiblecato88 wrote:Thats the basic physics evolution.WhatCanYouDoFermi? wrote:If grad EM isn't a requirement of your program, is it really necessary to take it or to read Jackson for your own benefit and personal enlightenment? I feel that having gone through all of Griffiths in gory detail I thoroughly understand the subject and I wonder what the next level up of classical EM contains that I haven't already seen. Maybe I am just ignorant, but is it necessary for most research areas?
a) learn something think you know it all
b) realize there is a whole lot you dont know
c) back to a)
applied to classical mechanics
a) Newtonian Mechanics
b)
c) Lagrangians Hamiltonians
Grad E&M seems to be required at pretty much every PhD program.
If by weird geometries you mean rectangular, spherical, and cylindrical....Helio wrote:i can just say from sitting in grad EM... it is basically finding the green function for the weirdest geometries possible
more like combinations of those, plus different potentials... it looks messy after a whilegrae313 wrote:If by weird geometries you mean rectangular, spherical, and cylindrical....Helio wrote:i can just say from sitting in grad EM... it is basically finding the green function for the weirdest geometries possible
grad e&m is not required here, and probably not necessary for my research. It depends on what you are interested in and where you go. Greens functions are important. I considered it a right of passage of sorts, and most of the 1st years were taking it, and I like E&M, so I went ahead and took it but I don't think it's essential for everybody.
Do you have any introductory solid state books that you would recommend?quizivex wrote:If you ever see Charles Kittel wandering around Berkeley, please flip him the finger. He deserves to be banished from the physics community after writing that atrocious solid state book, regardless of anything good he may have accomplished.![]()
I completely agree. I don't have the hate for Kittel that most people seem to, but I've been reading both Kittel and Ashcroft/Mermin on all the subjects we've done this semester, and A/M definitely gives a much more sophisticated and understandable explanation across the board (at least as far as I've gotten).dlenmn wrote:Just dive in with Ashcroft/Mermin. That book is real good.
slugger wrote:...other sections I feel like he just writes down an equation and 2 sentances "explaining" it.